🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.